And while the Independent and the Daily Mail battle it out in that
latter case of enrichment as to whether the particular hominid that raped a
ten-year-old in a swimming pool had his sentence dropped to a measly four years
or raised to a horrific seven years in prison (instead of auditing his
breathing apparatus with extreme prejudice) , we might ponder as to why our
ruling class even allows this thing to happen at all.
I mean, looking at that third link what kind of ruling class mind-set
lets a supposedly Christian charity be involved in this? :
‘In January, one month after the attack
was reported, the government introduced a controversial cap on refugees to be
allowed into the country...It set the bar at 37,500, fewer than half the number
who arrived in 2015. It avoids a potential confrontation with the wider EU.
Brussels had warned that a limit on numbers of asylum seekers would break the
bloc’s rules, as well as pandering to the rise of the far-right. "Breaking
EU law openly would have been a huge embarrassment for Austria," said a spokesman for Austria's
Catholic Caritas charity, which works with refugees and asylum seekers.'
Not that we should be surprised. The same ruling class that already takes or plans
to take an artisanal
or tailor-made attitude to
criminal sentencing is scarcely going to care overmuch about what the initials of EU stand for. Everyone's Union? Everywhere Union?
Still, it’s good to know that Black Lives
Matter’s history of peaceful protest and thoughtful rhetoric did
not in any way contribute to the Trump-hating humourous asides made by the
lightly sentenced torturing unfortunates that were found kind of guilty, yeah? I mean, you can call Trump
a white supremacist and a Klansman all day and every day and be in no way
responsible for the Trump-related torture of a white person. You just can't.
But complain rudely about Muslim immigration and you can lose
it all
and fair
enough.
Your daughters and sons can be raped and be unavenged. You can be murdered
and your killers are the real victims and you and your ancestors are to blame
and your rulers will import more of the same forever and ever, world without end.
You will be colonised from abroad and there is nothing your rulers will do to
stop it and they will punish you if you complain or resist. And don’t even
think about voting your way out. It’s. Not. Democracy. When. You. Do. It. Can you seriously want to conserve all this? Pickle it in aspic? Preserve it in amber?
Our ruling class hates us
and it doesn’t mind much if we die.
That’s the key, so remember
it:
Our ruling class hates us
and it doesn’t mind much if we die.
Bare days after the Islamic
truck murders in Sweden,
two of my colleagues were cooing over the placing of a local ‘Syrian’ and his
family in secure accommodation locally (paid for by you, dear reader) by
a different branch of the Bloated Bureaucracy. They speculated that he would be
grateful for the granting of asylum and the security that it brought - to him;
not to us, natch.
It would have been rude of
me (not to mention career-destroying) to speculate whether the newly secure fellow might one day lose his wife, lose some shitty job (if HMG
ever insisted that he work for a living using the valuable
transferable economic skills of the illiterate goat herd or unemployed kitchen
labourer) and then lose his mind and take the lives of strangers such as us. Much ruder than this.
At work, we’re part of the
outer edge of the ruling class: higher than tenured unionized dinner ladies but
lower than the head of Social Services who presided over forgotten Baby P’s
descent into earthly Hell. But this is how you get from valuing human life to
enabling a huge and growing threat to it. And we enable: we’ll be buying the
curtains or helping you pay for his TV licence and gas really soon.
So as La Belle France
looks about set to knit itself an intellectual scarf at its own self-induced
trip to the guillotine, remember the phrase that pays:
Our ruling class hates us
and it doesn’t mind much if we die.
“Ebba Akerlund's photo won't be
pushed in the lugenpresse. She will never be a Kurd on a beach, or a Syrian
gassed. She does nit fit the narrative of those who seek to ethnically replace
us our homelands, her murder by Muslims she is merely that ethnic replacement
in action.”
Then we get the ruling class
mathematical proof of its moral superiority:
“It doesn't really matter if she died. Hell, it doesn't matter if 10 or
even a 100 Ebba's died. How many migrants did Sweden save from hellish
conditions? 100k? 200k?
So you're saying that the life of a 1 little girl is
more than that of 200k people? If the death toll was 10k sweden still
should take muslim migrants, because all humans are equal and their life has
equal value.”
Game over.
Remember.
Our ruling class hates us
and it doesn’t mind much if we die. Picture from here.
“Almost every
Swedish woman feels very or somewhat unsafe when they exercise alone in the
dark”, finds new research by the Aftonbladet newspaper in the wake of the vampire
attack crisis.
Combining a
wide-ranging study of attitudes of women towards being outside in the evening
on their own and personal interviews, the findings show that the statement of
34-year-old Ellinor Andersson that she carried a crucifix in her hand at night,
ready to strike out, are quite normal.
Talking to
Aftonbladet, the woman said: “I would never go running by myself at night”.
Another said she would never go out alone after seven in the evening.
The survey finds
that now 46 per cent of women aged 16 or over felt either very or somewhat
unsafe when they are alone in the dark, compared to just 20 per cent for men.
Even during the daytime many are uncomfortable, the results also show 43 per
cent felt insecure while in a city on their own, and around a third were
“afraid” of Swedish cities”.
Many women were
so afraid of trying to get home in the dark, they would go to lengths to avoid
it. Almost one third said they’d rather stay at a friend’s house overnight than
try and get home, should they be caught out by the falling sun.
The figures may
come as a surprise to some, given the reputation Sweden once enjoyed for being one
of the happiest and safest countries in the world. Today, Sweden has been
called the vampirism capital of the west, and despite efforts to debunk the
title it still has significantly higher than average rates of exsanguination.
While the
Aftonbladet study makes absolutely no reference to what precisely the women are
afraid of, the study comes amid a barrage of stories coming out of the country
of lone women being attacked by newly arrived vampires.
One major concern
is that many of these undead remain free after blood sucking, having been handed
extremely short sentences or not having been caught at all. A news story that
may weigh heavily on the minds of Swedish women, and was reported by their
national media before the police stopped revealing the identity of offenders in
crimes where vampires were involved to avoid seeming “superstitious”, is that
of a brutal gang attack in a secluded park that left a woman with “life
changing” injuries.
The 23-year-old
victim was attacked while sitting alone on a park bench by a gang of teenage vampires.
Once they beat her into submission the leader of the gang used his mobile phone
to call his friends to join them and participate — eventually the woman was bled
anally and vaginally six times by the group as her attackers laughed at her.
Because the revenants
were technically under 100 years of age they were tried in a newborn’s court
and all will be released this year, having been serves (sic) just six year burial.
The Master of the attack, who received nine years in a crypt couldn’t stand
even that, and escaped entombment last month and is now on the run.
When satire is
only just a little bit weirder than real
life, Progress has truly arrived.
To sign up to be Britain’s Political Prisoner Number 2, just post anything you like at your own blogs or comment or post over at Orphans of Liberty. Someone will be along to arrest you shortly.
By all means go on posting wherever you like about how Al Qaeda and Islamic terrorism are little more than pretexts for the State to oppress the rest of us with punitive emergency and security laws. I respect your integrity.
Help yourself to the Rights Of Englishmen and explain, with evidence, that the 9/11 attacks were enacted and planned by someone other than the people who said they did so. Be my guest: your freedom is precious to me (natural human sympathy aside) because if you lose your freedom, I will surely lose mine.
I disagree with such positions, (respectfully I hope), but please don’t think that by making those arguments here, or anywhere else, that you have some kind of right or legal protection if you say controversial things if our lords and masters find you annoying.
Because you don’t.
Please go on referring as our “Conservative” Prime Minister did to the English Defence League as ‘sick.’ I won’t hurt you if you do.
Jump aboard the Moral Equivalence bandwagon if you like and elide the EDL with the BNP as someone did over at the liberty-loving Adam Smith Institute blog. You can even describe them as right wing extremists if you like, and go shopping afterwards and maybe take in a movie, as long as it’s not Fitna, obviously.
I won’t put you in jail.
But if this blog’s kind visitors' and commenters’ commitment to freedom as a real thing to enjoy in the outside world is sincere, I hope that, at the very least, you will pass on the information about Britain’s Political Prisoner Number 1, the EDL’s ‘Tommy Robinson.’
Because of an alleged assault (for which he has not been convicted) he has been placed by a supposedly English court under certain interesting restrictions.
On June 24th, Blackburn Magistrates Court heard that on April 2nd 2011 Tommy had assaulted a man at a demonstration in Luton (sic, it was allegedly in Blackburn) – a charge he denies. The court granted bail, but subject to the following conditions:
He must not knowingly organise, travel to, or participate in any march, demonstration, protest or similar.
He must not send any article, letter, fax or email that seeks to promote or publicise any match, demonstration or protest in the open air.
He must report to Luton Police station every Saturday between midday and 2pm.
This person is, if our courts are fair and just, a convicted football hooligan. See Wikipedia’s reliable and unbiased report here. You might not like him. He’s a million miles from perfect.
But because of an alleged assault in Blackburn (for which he has not been convicted, did I mention?) he has been banned form speaking freely, assembling freely, travelling to our free nation’s capital city on Saturday afternoons at 2 PM: nor communicating freely by new media or old about any subject at all concerning which he might not agree with, for example, the government.
Got that?
He has no civil rights at all to take part in any form of political debate anywhere because some politically biased magistrate has decided he’s all that bad stuff and therefore he doesn’t count.
So he broke these bail restrictions and went to prison for doing so. I’m a conservative, old-style, and I respect the idea of obeying the law in a lawful and free society. I just don’t happen to believe that I live in one any more.
I can’t think of a poster at this site that hasn’t written something or other that someone in what passes for authority in this country would not object to.
So please, pass on the link and this information to whomever you can. Perhaps ask these questions. Please also consider putting a few quid towards his defence against our politicised courts: money you might otherwise spend on something the government hasn’t banned you from buying yet – or made compulsory. Do all that, if you like. Just don’t go thinking that you have some kind of a right to do it because you haven’t: it’s a privilege.
The BBC alludes to a technical hitch in the Swedish government’s attempts in 2007 to ‘promote understanding’ between Muslims and their naughty neighbours.
Seven people have been arrested in the IrishRepublic over an alleged plot to kill a Swedish cartoonist for depicting the Prophet Muhammad, police say.
Nice of the BBC to clarify they weren’t planning to kill a Swedish cartoonist for depicting any of all those other Muhammeds that there seem to be so many of in the news these days.
.
The four men and three women are all Muslim immigrants, according to media reports, though a police statement did not confirm this.
Cartoonist Lars Vilks had depicted the Prophet Muhammad with the body of a dog in the Nerikes Allehanda newspaper.
Islamic militants put a $100,000 (£67,000) bounty on his head.
Now, now, that’s not militancy.
It’s open-handedness perhaps, or high-rolling, or free-spending, or falling short of the ecumenical ideal, but putting up money to kill a human being for drawing a cartoon can’t fairly be called ‘militancy.’
I just wish that the BBC or I could think of a better word for it...
Ah, well.
Mr Vilks was quoted as saying he was unfazed by the arrests, which he said he thought could be linked to two death threats he had received by telephone in January.
I don’t know about you , but I’d like a little context about how a man under several death threats and whose life had been actively plotted against feels ‘unfazed,’ relaxing though the BBC makes it all sound. But with a tiny £800,000,000 per year news budget, I don’t suppose that the BBC had the resources to answer such a question. Or pose it.
Or conceive of it.
RTE said those in custody were originally refugees from Morocco and Yemen, but had gained asylum and were in the Republic of Ireland legally.
You know, one think I’d just hate would be to be slaughtered like a lamb by having my throat cut by someone who didn’t have the proper paperwork.
"I'm not shaking with fear, exactly," he told Swedish news agency TT after Tuesday's arrests.
"I have prepared in different ways and I have an axe here in case someone should manage to get in through the window."
I have got to get some of that Swedish stuff, whatever it is, and start taking it now.
He sounds so relaxed, you know? He doesn’t seem fazed at all by the thought of what the other six would have done whilst he was trying to dislodge the axe from the flopping body of Assailant Number One.
In 2007 a group linked to al-Qaeda in Iraq offered a $100,000 reward for killing Mr Vilks, and a 50% bonus if he was "slaughtered like a lamb" by having his throat cut.
It offered another $50,000 for the murder of Ulf Johansson, editor-in-chief of the regional newspaper, Nerikes Allehanda.
At this point, one might expect the BBC to invite comments, and open a Have your Say page with a title like;
Have you ever been threatened with death by exsanguination or beheading by Muslims for producing a cartoon or any other item of edgy popular culture? We’d like to hear your story.
Of course, one would only expect that in a world where humans had directly evolved from dinosaurs or in which Michael Foot’s slanders of the anti-Appeasement Tories never became part of official history, but not in this, fallen world of ours.
Oh, and the BBC helpfully explains what might have inspired seven human being to plan to murder someone who drew a cartoon, and also provides some much-needed context at last:
In January, one of the cartoonists whose drawing appeared in Jyllands-Posten, the Dane Kurt Westergaard, was targeted in his own home, allegedly by a Somali radical Muslim with an axe.
Mr Westergaard, who escaped unharmed, had depicted the Prophet Muhammad with a bomb in his turban.
Mr Vilks told The Associated Press news agency that the telephone threats in January had come from "a Swedish-speaking Somali. He reminded me about what had happened to Westergaard and threatened with a follow-up and that 'now it's your turn'."
.
So far, so dhimmi.
But the BBC droid then mentions this:
At the time, Swedish officials expressed regret at any hurt caused to Muslims' feelings, but said the government could not prevent the publication of such drawings because of media freedom rules.
To clarify this, you can follow a side link to this piece from 2007.
Sweden's Prime Minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt, has met ambassadors from 22 Muslim countries in an effort to defuse a row about a Prophet Muhammad cartoon…
Mr Reinfeldt said he told the ambassadors that under the Swedish constitution, politicians were not allowed to "interfere with how the media [works] and what it chooses to publish".
Hear that sound?
That’s the sound of the liberal world government (eastern Scandinavian Branch) admitting that a minor technicality alone prevented them from allowing the head-lopping, bomb-planting, child-murdering, Jew-hating Religion of Peace from silencing another mild (and possibly ironic) allusion to something Islamic.
I was born in a country and to a civilisation that had beaten fascism and Nazism and whose leadership were at least prepared to pay lip service to the idea that freedom of expression is a valuable human right: not one in which a head of government apologizes that religio-political tyranny in Sweden has been delayed by some trivial technical detail such as the national constitution.
Seán Lester: German reconstruction not being addressed Germans have not been able to obtain building supplies to repair damage.
League of Nations Secretary General Seán Lester has said more must be done to repair damage done in Alsace-Lorraine by British military action one year ago. Mr Lester said Germans were being denied "basic human rights" and urged Britain to end its "Uncceptable and counterproductive blockade". He said British well-being depended on conditions improving in the Continent. Rallies are being held across Germany to mark a year since the conflict, in which 14,000 Europeans were killed.
In comments printed on the League's news magazine, Mr Lester said he was "deeply concerned that neither the issues that led to this conflict nor its worrying aftermath are being addressed". He said that while levels of violence had been low in the past year, there was still no durable ceasefire after The Norwegian Campaign and Germans were "denied basic human rights". "The quality and quantity of humanitarian supplies entering Greater Germany is insufficient, broader economic and reconstruction activity is paralysed," said Mr Lester. Under Britain's blockade of Europe, only basic humanitarian supplies are allowed in, meaning Germans have not been able to obtain materials to repair damaged homes, buildings and infrastructure.
The League Commission for Refugees (LCR) in Germany told the BBC that public health was suffering as a result of inadequate and unsanitary water supplies, and there had been a rise in infant mortality. LCR spokesman Cristoforo Martini said thousands of tons of sewage were being pumped into the North Sea every day, because material for rebuilding treatment plants and other facilities was so scarce. An international humanitarian aid convoy of some 200 vehicles is hoping to mark the anniversary by delivering supplies to Germany. The convoy is currently in Sweden, awaiting permission to cross the Baltic Sea and proceed to Denmark.
The National Socialist Party, which controls Germany, is holding 22 days of rallies to mark the anniversary. Senior leader Joseph Goebbels said Germans remained "steadfast" after the conflict "The resistance, which defended its land with honour, was not broken," the AFP news agency quoted him as saying.
Mr Lester called on Britain to end its blockade, uphold international law and make it possible for economic activity and civilian reconstruction to take place. He also urged The National Socialist Party to respect the law and bring an end to violence, and for all Europeans to "work for unity". He said there was "a sense of hopelessness in Germany today for 70 million Germans, half of whom are under 18" and that "a fundamentally different approach to Germany is urgently required". "Their fate and the well-being of Britain are intimately connected."
The BBC's Diana Mitford in Berlin said the mood on the anniversary of the Poland Campaign was relatively quiet, but uneasy. Both Britain and Germans in Europe believe 1941 is bound to bring further violence, our correspondent adds.
Leading community members in Harrow have condemned anti-Muslim campaigners planning a protest in the borough this weekend.
A letter signed by rabbis Aaron Goldstein, Hillel Athias-Robles, Kathleen Middleton, Frank Dabba Smith, and Michael Hilton has offered support for the borough's Muslims.
In an attack on “those whose only purpose is to spread hatred and fear”, they wrote: “We share the desire of the Muslim community of Harrow to respect our mutual traditions, to learn from each other's cultures and ways of life, and to live together in peace.”
The rabbis represent Northwood and Pinner Liberal Synagogue, Middlesex New Synagogue, Harrow and Wembley Progressive Synagogue, and Kol Chai Hatch End Jewish Community.
The group, Stop Islamisation of Europe, is planning a protest outside the mosque in Station Road on Sunday.
The show of unity from the Jewish community is in defiance of a website appeal by SIOE for 1,000 Jews carrying the Israeli flag to turn up.
If you think that Stop The Islamification Of Europe is racist/fascist/Nazi, then you can look here and make up your own mind - about their public face at least.
You don’t have to have read either or both of the Left’s prescribed books to realise how Nazi anti-Semitism arose on the streets of Germany, and so I can see how Jewish groups might not want ethnic-based politics anywhere near their homes. Fair enough; it could be (you should excuse the expression) a genie they don’t want let out of the lamp. It would also make sense if standing up against SIOE(UK) allowed or encouraged local ‘moderate Muslims’ to feel secure; happy about their Jewish neighbours; and encouraged to stand up in turn against their own ‘extremists.’ Question; does anyone out there capable of using formal polysyllables believe that this is a likely result?
I don’t know what the Yiddlish expression for as asinine as an ant at an aardvark assembly is, but this lot deserve it.
This, however, seems to be yet another case when mainstream Jewish bodies cast their eyes humbly away from the bedrock anti-Semitism at the core of Islam, and risk encouraging that vile aspect of the ideology that threatens us all.
Here, for example, is freedom of speech hero Ezra Levant on Canadian ‘official’ Jews supporting a Muslim anti-Semite:
Last week, I pointed out that Calgary's Official Jews invited notorious anti-Semites to co-sponsor a Jewish rally against anti-Semitism.
I know, it sounds too strange to be true. But it is.
One of those Jew-haters is Syed Soharwardy, a vicious, anti-Semitic bigot who trivializes the Jewish Holocaust, spreads blood libels against the Jewish Talmud, says Israel is perpetrating a Holocaust of its own against Palestinians, publicly calls for sharia law to be implemented in Canada, and participated in a pro-terrorist rally in the Jewish neighbourhood of Calgary, replete with a flag of Hezbollah.
I first came to know this odious man up close, when he hauled me before the Alberta human rights commission for publishing the Danish cartoons of Mohammed. Before that, the little thug actually tried to have me arrested by the Calgary Police Service for publishing those cartoons, as if we were back in his beloved Saudi Arabia, where the police take care of the infidels.
Syed Soharwardy is anti-Semitic scum.
Calgary's Official Jews freaked out when I publicized the words and deeds of this bigot, because they had so publicly cast their lot in with him. Some of the OJs wrote public comments on on my blog, and others wrote to me directly. All of their comments were the same, in that they ignored Soharwardy's anti-Semitism, and instead railed against me for my criticisms. In other words, they weren't embarrassed that they were friends with Soharwardy. They were embarrassed that they were caught.
The officials seem to be clueless as to where this Islamic anti-Semitism comes from.
If only there were some kind of mechanical contraption that could provide speedy access to information from outside the narrow information sources shared by the mainstream media! It would be marvellous if dissenting information could thus be made available worldwide – and including to the Jewish leaders of Harrow.
Here are a couple of pieces that might create the tiniest possibility of the chance of clue potential appearing inside those brilliant, brilliant minds of Harrow.
By the late seventh century, and certainly by the eighth, Islamic ideas began to penetrate Europe, where they had a profound influence. European Christians, for example, began to think, for the first time, in terms of “Holy War,” an idea that would have been unthinkable in earlier centuries. There is strong circumstantial evidence that they began also to influence European thinking about the Jews.
Anti-Semitism of course preceded the rise of both Christianity and Islam; and Christianity itself had a long history of antagonism towards Jews well before the appearance of Islam. The antagonism was mutual, and Jewish leaders were in the early centuries as vociferous in their condemnation of Christianity as Christian leaders were of Judaism. Serious violence between the two groups was, however, uncommon; and the first real pogrom launched by Christians against the Jews in Europe did not happen until the beginning of the First Crusade, in 1096. But this was not the first pogrom against Jews in Europe; an event which occurred in Cordoba in Spain in 1011. This was followed by another outbreak of mass-murder in Granada in 1066. Neither massacre was carried out by Christians, however, but by Muslims.
And
Anti-Semitism in the Islamic world has often been attributed to the baneful influence of Christianity. Many analysts assert that the Islamic designation of Jews (as well as Christians) as “People of the Book” indicates a higher level of respect for them than was manifested by Christians who derided Jews as bestial “Christ-killers.” Journalist Lawrence Wright asserts in this vein in The LoomingTower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11:
Until the end of World War II … Jews lived safely—although submissively—under Muslim rule for 1,200 years, enjoying full religious freedom; but in the 1930s, Nazi propaganda on Arabic-language shortwave radio, coupled with slanders by Christian missionaries in the region, infected the area with this ancient Western prejudice [anti-Semitism]. After the war, Cairo became a sanctuary for Nazis, who advised the military and the government. The rise of the Islamist movement coincided with the decline of fascism, but they overlapped in Egypt, and the germ passed into a new carrier.
This is a common view, but in reality there is a strong native strain of anti-Semitism in Islam, which is rooted in the Qur’an. The Muslim holy book contains a great deal of material that forms the foundation for a hatred of Jews that exists independently of the Christian variety. It is also, in many ways, more virulent and harder to eradicate. The Qur’an portrays the Jews as the craftiest, most persistent, and most implacable enemies of the Muslims—and there is no Muslim equivalent of the Second Vatican Council to mitigate against destructive interpretations. The Qur’anic material on the Jews remains the prism through which far too many Muslims see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—and Jews in general—to this day.
It’s complex, it’s long, and it’s – what’s the expression?- nuanced. But it’s a thousand times more clued in than the Jews of Harrow, who do remind me of mice protesting against the speying of feral cats, and who seem to see only people demonstrating on their streets as a threat – and not, perhaps, part of the salvation that we all need.
And that includes the heroic majority of Muslims who aren’t interested at all in changing our country into a hell-hole of Middle Eastern corruption and cruelty.
How on earth did I miss it last year? Did I miss it at all, or are approaching old age and anger messing with my memories like Willow interfering with Tara in her sleep?
Perhaps I blogged furiously about it at the time, but supermarket budget vodka and absolutely everything that President Obama, Gordon Brown, David Cameron and the BBC have done since have wiped that spurt of fury from my recollections.
Perhaps it was because it was my birthday and I was therefore eating a curry with Mrs. Northwester and watching The Matrix or The Thirteenth Warrior or some other towering cultural item that (half) explains but (mostly) disappoints as a metaphor for our times.
Anyway, it might amuse readers to think on’t and chuckle about the BBC’s pallid cultural relativism and its moral compass stuck due Left. Are you ready for this? Are you sitting comfortably?
Then I’ll begin.
“Some Imams 'biased against women’”
Many women felt they did not get a fair hearing under Sharia law
A Muslim think tank has found some UK Imams discriminate against women when enforcing Islamic Sharia law.
Whatever next, O my lucky readers? What other discomforting situations might the Gramscian BBC disingenuously camouflage, soften, and excuse in their mission to see us all onto the slave block or into the graveyard?
Suggestions, please, as some of you have been in good inventive form this week. I’ll start us off, as it’s Friday and all.
“Some Russians ‘were a bit peckish’ under Soviet Communism.”
Many citizens of the new USSR had less to eat than the minimum recommended daily calorific amount more than once in the early years after the Bolshevik Revolution. Historical research has uncovered contemporary accounts describing the absence of some foodstuffs from Soviet-era village shops and department stores on more than one occasion.
Pounce, via Biased BBC, observes that the BBC’s all breathless about what we’ll be able watch on the big screen once the Harry Potter series ends, and guess what? It’s going to be even better!
The single thing that makes some Islamic countries more influential in world’s culture and civilisation than Finlandfor its Nokia company, or Ireland for its Guinness, or Lichtenstein for its postage stamps, and the BBC alludes to it. Can we protest: "No popcorn for oil?"
An epic movie about Islam's Prophet Muhammad is in the pipeline, backed by a producer of the Lord of the Rings.
This I’ve got to see! Admittedly, there’s only one noticeable cute single woman in the whole Lord of the RingsMuhammad they’re going to bag her head as well. And what’s with the spelling of his name, anyway? You can never trust those dhimmis at the Beeb when they discuss matters of – well - anything at all really, and so why they chose this variant for one can only speculate, instead of Mohammad, trilogy, but in Muhammed,Mohamed, Muhammed, Muhamed, Mehmed, Muhammed, Muhammet, Muhamet, Mehmet, Mohand, Mahometus (which kinda rhymes, if you know what I mean), Maometto, Moameth, Mahoma, Mukhammad, Magomed, Maxamed, Mamadou, Makhambet. Perhaps that’s the most peaceful and loving spelling, and the variant we are least likely to associate with beheadings or female genital mutilations, honour killings and genocidal anti-Semitism I suppose.
American Barrie Osborne, who also produced The Matrix, (AKA Thu Matricks, Da Meddrigs, la Matrisse, Der Mettriks, Dumb Hat-tricks,) told Reuters the film would be an "international epic" aimed at "bridging cultures". It will also include people who don't know what the hell's going on with or without sunglasses.
Ooh goody! This is us, aren’t we lovely? films, like the Triumph Of The Will and Battleship Potemkin, or the North Korean comedy cult classic Mamma’s Got A Brand New Bag With Absolutely Nothing To Put In It.
I can imagine that the small-scale back story will be of a simple family man trying to make his way in the world and feed his family amidst titanic historical events when suddenly someone kills all his brothers and rapes and enslaves his womenfolk and castrates him for sale up North, but he dies of septicaemia on the way.
In accordance with Islamic rules, the Prophet cannot be depicted on screen. Images of the Prophet are considered blasphemous by Muslims.
Here’s one, for example.
The $150m (£91m) English language film should go into production in 2011.
Qatari media company Alnoor Holdings, which is behind the plans, said it wanted to attract the "best international talent" for the film.
So, let’s see. That’s the Scientologist Tom Cruise as the voice of The Prophet (if they can’t get him that did Shrek or the lion off Madagascar or someone), and Jeff Goldblum as Abu Bakr, and the entire cast of Saint Trinian’s as The Prophet’s wives and, er, so on.
"The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam," Osborne said.
