Thursday, 10 March 2016
Twilight
Saturday, 10 January 2015
The Nancies of Nancy?
Picture from here.
Saturday, 4 January 2014
Quote of the (last) month
Wednesday, 13 February 2013
Pease pudding and saveloys
Tuesday, 10 November 2009
Easy does it
They’re killing us by accident. Mostly.
Stan and Julia both post about the off-duty policeman who followed a mother who chastised her kid in public, and who then caused officers to visit her home, and warn her about her child-rearing methods and to warn her that she was now on the local authority’s list for years to come.
As Julia points out, they don’t seem to be so keen to follow up real cases of persistent child abuse from people who just might kick off in court, or in police stations, or on their doorsteps if police ask them how they’re bringing up their kids. Thanks to The Ranting Penguin, we learn that this one got away with arson. Baby P was seen often and his awful plight ignored but there are many cases of officialdom picking on the law-abiding, but it’s not only because they’re Gramscian Marxists, but because they are officials.
It’s not deadly, yet. What happens is that, if officials aren’t kept to their duties; to the idea that some conduct is wrong; that there are duties as well as rights that their ‘customers’ have, then anything is seen to go, and eventually the loudest and the nastiest will prevail – out of bureaucratic inertia.
This is so true in the whacky world of welfare benefits. Those who politely ask how their benefit claim is coming on because the bills are mounting up are told that their claim will be paid in chronological order. Please wait your turn. Take a number. All in due course. Those who ring or visit every single day are helped faster because otherwise their harassment of officials will waste even more time. Screamers go straight to the head of the queue, and will have their cases looked at again and again even though they are not entitled or are only minimally entitled because they’ve got enough money already. We put up with under-age kids who say they’ll get pregnant if they don’t get the accommodation they want – and not report them to the police. What manager wants the fuss of the Data Protection ‘issues’ that would arrive on his or her desk a week later? We fail to report to Social Services families who are clearly having too many children for their meagre accommodation to be safe or well-rested – let alone to get any homework done, ever.
Don’t rock the boat, don’t tick the boxes marked ‘refer’ or ‘call security.’ It’s just too much trouble.
So the irresponsible breeders and the drunks and the junkies who can come into the office and raise merry hell or to keep our phone lines busy and keep other work undone get a free pass and the red carpet treatment. We’re taught to be customer–friendly, non-judgemental, and diverse. We mustn’t think of them as scum or ever allude to their misdeeds (that’s never stated openly – it’s just part of ‘customer service.’)
So the Baby Ps it kills by inertia, and the seven kids squeezed into a housing association terrace built for four people, tops, whilst the parents trouser the benefits intended to buy more for them, and they’re well on their way to uneducated criminality, addiction and knife fighting to pas the time. The Reds are right in this one: poor housing kills because it creates poor human beings who kill or die young.
All this lacks malice and conspiracy on officialdom’s part – but still people die.
It gets worse, as Mark Steyn and Melanie Phillips point out.
Once extreme political correctness is added to the amoral moral equivalence of state bureaucracies everywhere, then the biggest fuss-makers and the biggest kickers-off of all get a free pass for years - until the get the message and decide to spread the word big-time.
And then the innocent die in handfuls.
Saturday, 21 March 2009
You say Gestapo, and I say GESTAPO
This from here.
A serving police officer named in a leaked list of British National Party (BNP) members has been sacked.
Pc Steve Bettley, of Merseyside Police, was included in the list of the far right party's entire membership register which was leaked on an internet blog.
A Merseyside Police spokeswoman said: "A Merseyside Police misconduct panel has dismissed Constable Steve Bettley after concluding he had knowingly been a member of the British National Party from March 2007 and up to March 2008."
The spokeswoman added: "In determining their findings, the panel confirmed there was no evidence that Pc Bettley had ever displayed any racist views or discriminatory behaviour in the workplace.
"The panel determined that Pc Bettley's membership of the BNP is a clear breach of lawful orders and police regulations as the party's views are incompatible with the duties and values of the Police Service."
Let's read that again, shall we?
"...the party's views are incompatible with the duties and values of the Police Service."
Here is the BNP's policies page.
Why not take a look? - it's not catching.
Now I'd like to know which of those policies is 'incompatible with the duties and values of the Police Service' , and why, and who decided that they are against what the police stand for.
Okay, you could make the argument that the British National Party is secretly a racist party - or not so secretly given what some of its leaders have said and some still say, in print and out loud. But there's nothing secret about the ill-will and brutal imperialism of the Koran, Hadith and Sira, and no Muslim police are sacked from the police for their beliefs. Of course, a majority of Muslims are law-abiding and peaceful, and so do not need to be sacked from the police. Likewise the vast majority of BNP members are law-abiding and peaceful I'm sure.
This sacking is the loss of livelihood for someone who has committed no crime, nor any professional misdemeanour - but that he has broken the politically-correct (cultural Marxist) ideological hegemony.
Instead of being politically neutral, our Police Service is now ruining peoples' lives (and wasting the cost to taxpayers of his training and that of his replacement and making our streets are less safe to the extent of the loss of one officer) by sharing and enforcing the ideology that has assaulted so much of our suffering nation and its ancient institutions.
They are wrong to have done so, and it is a threat to all our freedoms that this officer is dismissed.
Shame on them, and the leakers of the membership list. They won't feel ashamed, of course, they will be jubilant, but they represent one of our nations' powerful enemies.
But
Vetting public servants because of their beliefs should be done, if it should happen at all, by judicial review with objective assessment of what beliefs are and how they might effect the professionalism of each individual officer.
If applied, it should apply to all potentially or suspected ‘extremists.’
This has not been done - he's out because of his beliefs and that's that.
It's wrong. It’s not fair. It's against what our country stands for, and it should be opposed.
PC Bettley should be reinstated.
I may lose at least one blog follower for this - the one with the bushy tail - but here goes.
I do not support the BNP or endorse them because I am a conservative, and as such I support the existing constitution - albeit one restored to its former, pre-EU and pre-Political Correctness good health, and the BNP presents reactionary, rather than conservative policies.
Conservatives should restore the previous arrangements - the BNP wishes to create something new to replace the cultural Marxist state and I mistrust their plans.
They plan new arrangements within the constitution and propose centralizing and statist economic policies which are typical of classical fascism (the historical ideology; let's forget about boots and black shirts and banners here.)
All that is against conservatism as I see it.
Friday, 16 January 2009
Hogwartshire Education Authority Guidance
Dealing with Occult Incidents in Schools
The Matthew Hopkins Inquiry report states that "an occult incident is any incident which is perceived to be occult by the victim or any other person."
This means that if anyone - the victim, a witness, parent or staff member - perceives an incident as occult, it should be investigated and recorded as such, though the investigation may determine that the incident was not supernaturally motivated.
Identifying Occult Behaviour
Occult incidents can involve any member of the school community and may be:
pupil to pupil
pupil to adult
adult (teacher, parent, support staff, visitor to school) to pupil
adult to adult
Some incidents may not involve a direct victim and these are described as 'victimless'. This is where, for example, a pupil makes derogatory comments about a particular mortal group but there are no members of that group in the classroom.
Some other typical examples of occult incidents include:
incitement of others to behave in a occult way such as bringing occult leaflets, magazines or computer software into school
physical assault against a person or group because of mortal status, magical ability and/or inability
verbal abuse and threats
derogatory name-calling, insults, occult jokes and language
occult graffiti - wearing occult badges or insignia and other provocative behaviour
occult comments during lessons
attempts to recruit other pupils and students to occult organisations and groups
refusal to co-operate with other people because of their mortal status, magical ability and/or inability
ridiculing someone because of their magical differences
Investigating Occult Incidents
All occult incidents, no matter how trivial they seem, should be investigated as quickly as possible. In order to optimise witness recall this should preferably be within one hour (or as soon as possible thereafter) of the incident taking place. It may be helpful to nominate a lead person responsible for investigating occult incidents. This person does not have to be a headteacher but should be a senior member of staff.
Schools should adopt an agreed approach for investigating occult incidents. For example, in the case of minor incidents it may be sufficient to obtain a verbal account from those involved. For more serious incidents, schools may wish to obtain a written statement that both victim and perpetrator sign and agree to as an accurate record of the incident. This will be particularly helpful in cases where there are no additional witnesses to the incident.
When investigating the incident, the school should respond appropriately to both the nature of the occult incident and to its level of seriousness. The school should be mindful of factors such as:
the age and level of understanding of the perpetrator
whether the perpetrator intended to inflict physical or emotional harm on the victim/s and whether they were aware of the effects of their action
whether actual and/or serious physical or emotional harm was inflicted on the victim/s
whether the incident was a one-off or part of a pattern
Recording and Reporting Occult Incidents
Keeping a record of occult incidents is important because it shows both the victim and the perpetrator that the school takes the issue of wichcraft seriously. It also demonstrates the way in which the school is meeting the legal requirements of the Magical Relations (Amendment) Act.
Reporting systems should be made easy so that all staff and pupils know the systems and feel encouraged to use them.
It is important that reports on incidents should be kept confidential to minimise repercussions for the victim.
The form in Appendix 1 should be used for recording all reported incidents and complaints. Once completed, a copy of this form should then be sent to the LEA for monitoring purposes and to enable the local authority to provide further advice, support and guidance if needed. The form may be sent by post or completed on-line via the Schools Grid on the Hogwartshire CC website. This information will be aggregated to analyse patterns of occult incidents in Tameside schools and to monitor changes in the number and nature of incidents over time. The LEA will not publish or report information on occult incidents on a school-by-school basis.
In addition, all incidents and the action taken should be reported to the governing body as part of the head teacher's termly report to governors. A suggested form is provided at Appendix 2 for this purpose. This will allow the governing body to monitor the number and type of incidents and to assess the effectiveness of the action taken.
It is good practise for schools to regularly analyse their recorded information to identify trends or patterns regarding the nature of incidents, who is involved and where incidents are happening. This will enable schools to take a proactive approach in preventing occult incidents.
In relation to each incident schools should consider whether it is appropriate to contact the LEA and/or other agencies for support and advice. If an assault takes place and the head teacher considers it to be serious, the matter must be reported immediately to the police and the LEA.
In the case of serious incidents, an assessment will be needed to find out:
whether the incident was so serious that the whole school community needs to be informed
whether teachers should explain the circumstances to all pupils
whether all parents/carers need to be informed
If there are no occult incidents during the school year, a "nil return" should be sent to the LEA using the form in Appendix 3 at the end of the summer term.
Key Points for Dealing with Occult Incidents
To summarise, the process for dealing with any reported incident will need to incorporate the following elements:
Investigating the incident to establish the facts
Providing support and assistance to the victim
Identifying the action to be taken with regard to the perpetrator(s)
Informing the parents of the victim(s) and perpetrator(s) of the incident and the action taken
Where a staff member is the victim or perpetrator, ensuring other procedures are followed (e.g. disciplinary or accident reporting)
Keeping a formal record of the incident, including the action taken where the incident is a serious one, notifying other agencies such as the LEA and/or the Police
Carrying out regular analysis of the number and nature of occult incidents to inform future policy development
Wherever possible, schools should try to adopt a consistent approach to occult incidents. It is accepted that teachers will use their professional judgement in dealing with specific incidents, however, schools may find the suggestions for action in Appendix 4 useful. In all cases, schools are encouraged to consider seeking the advice of the Community and Magical Relations Officer regarding possible police involvement (please call Hogsmeade Police Station 0161 856 9353).



