Showing posts with label New Labour State. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Labour State. Show all posts

Thursday, 12 November 2009

A taste of Paradise

Last Wednesday night a police car stopped beside me as I parked outside my home. I could get out but his passenger window was open and the officer inside told me to

‘Get into your car and put the headlights on,’ which I did. ‘And now walk to the front of the car.’

I obeyed, and one of the headlights was broken. News to me. Well, I never.

‘Oh,’ I said, all citizenly.

‘Get it sorted,’ came the voice from a now disappearing patrol car.

Well, they can’t say Mind how you go, sir, anymore, can they?


Thursday evening after work (I walk to work, so no driving for me between then and now) I picked up a replacement bulb from Halfords and, after a mere twenty minutes of staring upside down at my oil-stained Haynes through fog-obscured spectacles and with a spelunking lamp strapped to my skull, plus acquiring some sore knuckles, and the artistic deployment of three distinctive and ever-popular Anglo-Saxon verbs later, my offside headlight was as good as, well,… as good as that on any car that was made in Britain in the past twenty years and is affordable by the likes of me can be.

Then it was back into the house for dinner and a DVD with Mrs. NW, ignoring the fireworks and the piteous howling of the dog from next door.


Next day, I drove back from the gym and parked the car and my next-door neighbour asked me if I’ve had a bump.

‘No,’ I said, ‘Why?’

‘Because you had a lot of coppers looking at it yesterday,’ he said, ‘They were all from a big van, and they were looking closely at your car.’ That would be Thursday the day after the first copper pointed my headlight problem out.


This Monday night I put the recycling out. Three oblong plastic boxes with flat lids: one for plastic; one for paper and metal; one for cardboard and glass.

This process involves picking up each box lid and pouring the rain off it onto the yard’s concrete (we keep the boxes outside because they’re too big and dirty to keep in the kitchen or the living room or to drag them up from the cellar, see?), then replacing it and carrying the box to the front door ready to take out and put on the pavement. Repeat twice, but remember to lock the back door on your way with Box Number Three in case the local welfare recipients decide to nip in while I’m at the front to pick up any unconsidered trifles, etc.

On the Tuesday afternoon I got home and the boxes were empty, except for the plastic-recycling one, in which a number of punnets for small tomatoes and a box for cheese spread still lies, all unwanted. I reversed the process with the added fun of lifting the plastic box to the top of the wheelie-bin into which non-recyclable waste is usually placed and collected fortnightly, alternating with the recycling collection, and tipping what the picky recyclers have left into that one.


This Tuesday morning I drove to a training course which was held in a well-known local government building situated a mere conventional Hamas rocket flight from Castle City. It’s a nice building: comfortable and well maintained, and in its lobby area were numerous leaflets on health and safety and anti-Racism and other services that local democracy provides. There’s also a wall covered with photo portraits of successive mayors and a display case containing awards and certificates: for recycling local waste; for Investors In People; for energy efficiency: and a scale model tank presented to its home council by the local regiment.

It was too cold to be comfortable all day. Throughout the day-long training course we all wore our fleeces and pullovers, and most of us kept our coats on, too. The toilets were gloomy because the lights were set to off unless you insistently pressed the on-switch with a bit of heft behind your shoulder. It was a relief to get back into my car, whack the heating on full, and drive back to Castle City and the unwanted tomato punnets and the lonely Dairylea container.


This is all political.

This is also utterly unnecessary.


There is no need for policemen to be rude, patronizing bullies who order people around without a ‘please or ‘thank you,’ - let alone the formerly universal ‘sir’ I’d have expected only ten years ago. How hard can it be to say ‘Your left headlight’s not working, sir, please fix it before you drive at night again’? I don’t know what they hoped to achieve sending a large van full of police in broad daylight to check my car, unless it was formerly owned by a gangster, or they were hoping to find something wrong that’s towable or finable. It’s not a pretty vehicle, but it goes and I maintain its safety systems as well as its going places systems – until a bulb goes, and then I replace it. The police are busy, it seems, throwing their weight around with harmless people in their sights. I’d love to know what they were all doing the 10 nights to date when my car has been vandalized in six years of parking on this street. In all that time I got one cop car suggesting we install cameras, two plastic PCs (of whom one though tit funny me replacing my wandering wing mirror in the rain) and one Saturday morning an actual SOCO who found nowt, bless her, but she did finger-print the thing. I no longer look forward to speaking to the police confident in the belief that I’ll be treated politely and listened to as I once did. Some officers certainly put their lives and health on the line – and I’m grateful for that – but rudeness and not being interested in ‘minor crimes’ at the same time? Not encouraging.

Parliament is in charge of the overall police system and there are political appointees on all the County constabularies’ Police Committees. I guess Parliament and the political appointees aren’t doing their jobs properly in letting this deterioration happen. I hope that they aren’t doing their jobs properly, that is.


Britain’s full of holes in the ground to put domestic rubbish in - old quarries and mines and modern incinerators now burn so hot that much waste can be rendered harmless by them. Instead, we have to recycle. I’m pretty fit and healthy for my age, what with the swimming and the dancing and all, but I have mild arthritis in my knees and fingers. Kneeling down and standing up to sort rubbish into different bins in cold or rain or hail or high winds or whatever is not a comfortable experience, and I pity seriously disabled or doddery old people who have to carry these stinking bins through their homes because the recycler lorry crews don’t come up the ginnels at the back of our terraces – unlike the wheelie-bin people. Do Greens ever wonder how nasty it is for the old and the infirm to have to go through these Gaian rituals weekly or more often? And who asked for this silly regime other than the politicians? Others agree, whilst some hold onto their communitarian dream of universal obedience to the gods of eco-religion – see the comments to this post.

Politicians have decreed that recycling is good and that its opposite should be criminalized, and so there goes privacy.


I got to spend an uncomfortable day in a poorly-heated council building because the council concerned wanted to ‘reduce carbon emission’ in order to protect ‘the planet’ from the global warming of a world that’s actually getting colder. The politicians and the politicians alone have the power to keep us deliberately uncomfortable. I’m all for thrift, and especially so in the public sector where I work, and I imagine that the idea of chilling or even freezing people who volunteer to work in the whacky world of benefits is actually alluring to some of my readers, but putting your employees and guests into rooms like old-style cold-slab pantries? Isn't that actually rather cruel, and what the trade unions are supposed to fight against?


Back in 1997 I dreaded the imminent arrival of the New Labour project; expecting it to represent every kind of foolishness made flesh as decades of Left-wing, State-worshipping grudges were transformed into policy to build their heaven on earth. I expected that they would, and was not disappointed that they did bankrupt the public finances and I expected that their reign would basically be like living in a student union all year round.


But if you’d told me that after twelve years of them being in power I’d find myself: nervous of the attentions of British policemen in the hours of darkness; forced to scrabble about in the dark and rain with my household garbage; and be physically chilled on purpose by their local satraps, I’d have laughed in your face.


Welcome to Paradise.


Let’s destroy it.

Monday, 5 October 2009

Liberal stance on violent bigotry 100% consistent

Only joking!

Here we have our philosopher kings’ judgement on keeping convicted terrorists in for longer period: it’ll make them worse.


UP to 30 “high-risk” terrorists — including some of the most dangerous men in Britain — are due to be released from jail in the next year.

More are being freed in the wake of a ruling by Britain’s most senior judges that long sentences for terrorist crimes could “inflame” rather than deter extremism.


It seems that the longer you keep them in, the harder they are treated, the more likely Muslims are to become ‘militants.’


Rahman, a key Al-Qaeda player, recruited disaffected Muslims from northern England to fight British troops in Afghanistan.

The judges stated: “Care has to be taken to ensure that the sentence was not disproportionate to the facts of the particular offences. If sentences were imposed which were more severe than the circumstances of the particular case warranted, that would be likely to inflame rather than deter extremism.”


Got it? The nastier you treat people like this, the sooner their pals will resort to violence and ‘militancy.’ Liberal logic goes: if you make martyrs of Islamists terrorists by keeping them off the street and away from weapons for longer rather than shorter periods, then the more likely their chums on the outside are to become martyrs, and blow up civilians, fight British soldiers, etc.


And anyway, everyone knows that ‘Islamist’ militancy is down to the West’s exploitation of Muslim oil reserves and cheap labour, the illegal war against Iraq, and deep and universal Muslim concern for the human rights of the Palestinians in the occupied West bank, Jerusalem Gaza, and Tulsa.

Besides, early release shows that the West can, under the properly controlled circumstances of having liberals in charge of everything, be a gentle and kindly place for Muslims, and so they forgive us, move on, settle down, and blend in.


Okay, maybe that doesn’t work, but the principle’s fine and goes right back in liberal history to Rosseau and the French Revolution.


Anyway, here are Muslims who have never known the horror of Britain’s oppressive anti-terrorist laws in grateful peaceful protest.


Here they are protesting against the West’s exploitation of Muslim oil supplies and cheap labour:

…on September 11, 2009, a Muslim mob severely injured three Christians and ransacked two churches in Senbete, a town in the western Arsi zone of Ethiopia

Damn those oil-stealing missionaries: damn them to hell.


Here they are showing restraint and compassion in India by activists protesting against violence against men, women and children murdered by Israeli soldiers, only to be beaten back by draconian ‘anti-terrorist’ laws.

Militants often demand food and lodging in nearby villages.

When they forced their way into Miss Kausar’s home, her father Noor Mohammad refused their demands and was attacked.

His daughter was hiding under a bed when she heard him crying as the gunmen thrashed him with sticks.

You can clearly see the connection between caring attitudes towards ‘terror’ detainees and the reduction of militancy at work here.


And here they are remembering that Islam is a deeply peaceful and tolerant faith, from which it requires Wester-originated horrors to get any kind of a rise: let alone violence, as the war against the Iraqi people is carefully analyzed and thoroughly critiqued.

Former Muslim receiving death threats

Sabri Husibi, a former Muslim who is now an atheist, says he has been ostracized and threatened with death since publication of a Tulsa World article Saturday in which he was critical of Islam and all other religions.

God only knows how much worse things would be in Tulsa if convicted terrorists were kept in prison even longer.


But, whereas persecution of Muslims (read lawful imprisonment for terrorist acts following scrupulously fair trials) is the chief cause of militancy, radicalization and loss of community cohesion, it’s important to remove the livelihoods and at the same time leave at liberty knuckle -dragging neo-Nazis who are just waiting to start sending the crammed cattle trucks east.

Members of the British National party could be banned from the teaching profession after Ed Balls today ordered an inquiry into racism in schools.

The very idea of some beliefs being held in private by people who come into contact with children threatens the end of the world.


I suppose that the government’s racist message here is that while white British people can only learn useful lessons from, for example, losing their jobs after committing no crimes at all, on the other hand the ignorant old primitive Muslims, well, they just get ornery if you keep their most sophisticated theologians locked up for trivial and indeed religiously mandated acts of bravery.


Thanks to Vlad Tepes Blog and The Religion of Peace


Monday, 14 September 2009

Slaughterhouse 2010


The abolition hit list.


From Julia’s post on the war against patriotism in education I had a little idea.

I have a little list.


My list (and yours if you want to join in) sets out the organisations that promote the destruction of the four nation states that comprise Britain, and along with them the customs, morals and rules which make us what we are and largely make us as safe and free as possible in this fallen world.


The Local Education Authorities. Destroying education since 1974. Try this instead. Or better yet, this.


The Probation Service. Keeping criminals on the street and doing harm since getting the Christians out of their faces.


Next, please..?


James suggests Common Purpose.

I don't like them. I think they're up to no good. They're on the list to lose all their state funding.


Pavlov's Cat says the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Yep, we’ll have that down the dole ASAP I think – the banker in any British game of Victimhood Poker...and excellent practice for getting us out of messes that Edward Heath got us into.


Cloudesley Shovell, a welcome newcomer, says cease funding ASH - Action on Smoking and Health. Yes to that one too, sir. We’ll need them out of the way when we start to rebuild property rights again. And it’s a wizard wheeze…

The Human Rights Act per Mark Wadsworth -and the Tories' latest response to it.


Next?


 

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner