There’s a joke in
Goth and elsewhere that goes something like: “I’m only wearing black until they
invent a darker colour.” They even have a T-shirt about it now.
Now Right-wing
politics has its equivalent that (way behind the curve as ever) I only discovered
yesterday is actually A Thing, as the kids are calling it these days.
It’s called the neo-reactionary
movement or the Dark
Enlightenment.
Some of you chaps
out there in Rightwingland are probably muttering something like “Yes, and?” about now; being up-to-date web
surfers of the Right and you have long since known about this and gone
something like either:
“Meh; nutters,” or
“Yep, this might actually be an answer to/a
definition of what assails us all,” but A) “It can only lead to something worse,” or B) “I’d better keep quiet about this and do my best to help its project
on the sly before our common foe starts to strangle it at birth the way they
tried with all the other “New Rights” that anyone invented or discovered since
Gramsci did his thing.”
I don’t know if I
agree with it yet and if it is indeed true in the sense of, you know, pre-Marxist
truth. Can you choose not to agree with truth? Do I agree with gravity, for
example or merely accept it as inescapable? After only a few hours of (gin-soaked)
browsing I’m not sure if there is anything hopeful about it at all, but it’s tickled
me and seems to rub the right, i.e. the wrong people up the wrong way.
TDE has the right
enemies. So there’s that.
And of course
anything that paints me by my own standards as little better than a
bleeding-heart-pinko liberal has got to be worth a look.
Anyhoo, give it a
look if you like: there doesn’t seem to be much of a crossover into the kind of
Right-wing blogs I tend to haunt, albeit in a much more scaled-down way these
days.
But it does beg (and
sometimes overtly poses) the question: “What use is conservatism if all it
seeks to do is to preserve the mistakes of the recent past?”
When did any
conservative in power truly turn the clock back by one second, let alone the
calendar by a single year? I think I’ll read on. Perhaps I’ll get the T-shirt.
Unless the Dark Enlightenment is more of a members’ club tie thing, or a coat
of arms sort of deal.
Picture
from here.
1 comment:
But it does beg (and sometimes overtly poses) the question: “What use is conservatism if all it seeks to do is to preserve the mistakes of the recent past?”
And there's the rub. Ignore revisionists.
Post a Comment